A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:1 - Problem frame

Once one source-set and search/outcome-space substrate has been declared, many lines still need one second-order interpretive view for ordinary work.

Examples include:

• one archive-centered reading that needs optional metric or transition qualifier to explain why certain regions stay promising;
• one derived tradition or palette reading that must remain visibly derived from a base palette;
• one atlas-form reading that collects several typed set views, active set results, spaces, declared map refs, metrics, or distortion notes so that cross-scale structure stays readable;
• one interpretive rendering that helps the reader inspect the declared substrate without turning that rendering into the substrate’s default meaning.

Current FPF already points in that direction. A.6.3 governs EntityOfConcern-preserving epistemic viewing; E.17.0 separately qualifies a resulting episteme as a U.View through viewpoint conformance. G.2 already keeps TraditionAtlasView as optional neighboring interpretation over one palette and declared set results rather than making atlas semantics the meaning of Tradition itself. What is still missing is one common interpretive-view pattern that:

• stays explicitly under existing view law;
• keeps thinner interpretive views admissible;
• keeps atlas form reusable but non-default;
• and keeps interpretive qualifiers optional and recoverable.