fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 33811–33829

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:20:10 UTC

A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:7 - Conformance Checklist

Treat a line as conforming only if every gate below passes.

IDGate questionFail whenRepair or governing pattern
CC-A19IV-1Is one already-declared base substrate or source-set entry point or set-result entry point named explicitly?The interpretive view floats free of the line it is supposed to help read.Cite the base substrate or the recoverable source-set entry point or set-result entry point.
CC-A19IV-2When formal viewing is claimed, are the A.6.3 source and receiving epistemes recoverable, and is E.17.0 viewpoint conformance established separately for a U.View claim?A pattern citation is treated as sufficient to establish either relation.Recover the exact epistemes and viewing transformation; test the named viewpoint only when U.View qualification is needed.
CC-A19IV-3Does the line preserve the same EntityOfConcern and keep the base substrate as semantic center?The interpretive prose retargets the EntityOfConcern or repairs the substrate in place.Reopen under A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE, A.6.4, or the appropriate neighboring pattern.
CC-A19IV-4Are the current source set, any active set result, and any active derived view or base palette recoverable?The interpretive reading hides the base palette, base source/result, or active derived set result behind one fuller visible overlay.Restore the missing recoverability fields.
CC-A19IV-5Is the active profile chosen honestly: thin interpretation or atlas interpretation?Atlas language is used by reflex, or the line needs atlas interpretation but never says so.State the profile explicitly and justify why thin interpretation is or is not sufficient.
CC-A19IV-6If atlas form is active, is the composite atlas-form interpretation declaration complete?Several views, spaces, declared map refs, or qualifiers are being used, but TypedSetViews, cited spaces, declared map refs, qualifiers, or the reason thin interpretation is insufficient remain hidden.Publish the missing atlas-form interpretation declaration or step back to thin interpretation.
CC-A19IV-7Are interpretive qualifiers really substrate-side only and reused from the substrate side?Metrics, transitions, declared map refs, or distortion notes silently change the base relation or posture, or become mandatory core everywhere.Keep them as foregrounded qualifiers only, or reopen the substrate declaration.
CC-A19IV-8If TraditionAtlasView is used, is it kept as one G.2 specialization rather than the common family head?The local specialization is treated as if every interpretive case were already palette-first atlas work.Restore the split between DeclaredSubstrateAtlasView and TraditionAtlasView.
CC-A19IV-9Does the line stay out of publication and policy work?The prose starts deciding who survives, what is published, or what is shipped.Split the line and apply G.5, G.10, C.19, or C.24 to those questions.
CC-A19IV-10Could a cold reader choose thin interpretation versus atlas interpretation and fill one interpretive view declaration without hidden invention?The reader still needs surrounding memo knowledge to know which head to use, what fields matter, or why atlas is or is not needed.Fill the compact interpretive view declaration from 4.12 and state why thin interpretation is enough or why atlas interpretation is necessary.
CC-A19IV-11Is the inspection question explicit enough to tell the reader what this view helps inspect now?The view mostly restates the base theory, but the practical inspection load stays unnamed.State the inspection question directly and keep the base line recoverable beside it.
CC-A19IV-12When specialization, naming repair, publication, or policy becomes the next question, is the governing neighbor explicit?The interpretive prose silently drifts into G.2, F.18, A.6.P, G.5, G.10, C.19, or C.24 without naming the boundary.Split the line and cite the governing neighbor instead of stretching interpretive-view prose across that boundary.