fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 35663–35678

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:55:20 UTC

A.19.UINDM:8 - Common Anti‑Patterns and How to Avoid Them

  • “NCV ⇒ indicator.” Treating all measurable characteristics as indicators. Violates “No implicit NCV⇒indicator.”

  • Indicatorization hidden in scoring. A scoring method silently ignores some characteristics or introduces an implicit “feature selection” without an explicit indicator set.

  • Characteristic reference substituted for a position. Temperature occurs at Celsius and kelvin positions, but the returned set contains only TemperatureRef. Resolve the policy to the requested position or its explicitly selected all-matches set before returning S.

  • Silent emptying. When evidence is insufficient, returning an empty indicator set (or treating missing evidence as “pass”) without a tri‑state guard decision.

  • Reusing an indicator set after its basis or use changed. Reusing it for another bearer, scope and window, evidence basis, reference plane, or intended use without a new eligibility decision; or naming Bridge or plane-relation pins without an actual obtaining relation.

  • Smuggling plan‑binding into the mechanism. Binding concrete edition pins / planned slot fillings (“launch values”) inside the UINDM description instead of using the P2W seam (WorkPlanning) and recording only effective refs/pins in Audit.

  • GateDecision leakage. Emitting or implying GateDecision/GateLog as part of the indicatorize step (gate decisions are separated from suite steps; keep UINDM at guard+audit level).