A.3.1.QM:0 - Use This When
Use this pattern when a project has one or more Methods identified under A.3.1, candidate Method accounts, and situational criteria, but it still does not know which subjects are individually usable for the bounded result. Use it before a several-structure comparison when a weak subject can be rejected cheaply on its own.
Begin with one Method or candidate account, its status, the contribution it is expected to make, and the criteria that matter for that contribution. Keep whole-level allocation, synchronization, composition, and compatibility questions outside the individual result.
The first useful result says one of the following: an identified Method is qualified or not qualified for the bounded use; a candidate account is retained or excluded while its Method-identification question remains open; or a local connection claim is supported, unsupported, or unresolved independently of a whole synthesis.
Do not use qualification wording to admit a candidate account as a Method, to establish compatibility or parthood, or to declare a Method architecture fit.
A.3.1.QM:0.1 - Working Distinctions
| Name used here | Meaning |
|---|---|
| identified Method subject | A Method already identified under A.3.1; A.3.1.QM judges bounded use without repeating identity. |
| candidate-account subject | An episteme about a possible Method whose unresolved identity conditions remain visible throughout qualification. |
| individual contribution | The result or preserved condition attributable to this subject under the stated use, not the success of a whole arrangement. |
| local connection | An input/result, schema-correspondence, or adapter-feasibility claim whose truth does not depend on choosing one whole synthesis. |
| individual qualification | A bounded result covering contribution, applicability, inputs/results, attributable time or burden, capability, support, authority/access, evidence, source limits, and stop. |
| architecture question | A claim about combined allocation, timing, composition, Work overlap, provider arrangement, authority distribution, or another several-structure relation. It belongs to C.32.MWA.PP when live. |