fpf.tools
Jump to text
On this page
Copy and source
Original source · lines 10162–10172
Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-14 19:58:00 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-14 19:58:38 UTC · last check 2026-10-15 03:55:10 UTC

A.3.1.QM:11 - SoTA-Echoing

SourceRetained contributionUse boundary
Henderson-Sellers and Ralyté, Situational Method Engineering reviewSituational construction, selection, and adaptation questions.Source-local fragment and process ontologies do not determine FPF subject status.
Daalhuizen and Cash, Method Content TheoryGoal, procedure, rationale, framing, and mindset questions relevant to individual content and use.These variables do not become universal qualification dimensions or Method parts.
Gericke, Eckert, and Stacey, Elements of a design methodIntended use, scope, representation, procedure, tool, ecosystem, and adaptation conditions.Conceptual elements guide questions; current project evidence supplies the verdict.
Current FPF A.3.1, C.18, and G.5Method identity, candidate generation when needed, and bounded family/selector results.A.3.1.QM adds status-preserving individual qualification and the local-connection boundary.

Reopen when a current source or use shows that an individual question cannot be judged without a named whole structure, or when a repeated C.32.MWA.PP finding can be prevented by one affordable individual check.