fpf.tools
Jump to text
On this page
Copy and source
Original source · lines 10131–10141
Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-14 19:58:00 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-14 19:58:38 UTC · last check 2026-10-15 03:55:10 UTC

A.3.1.QM:7 - Conformance Checklist

  • Every subject is an identified Method or a candidate Method account and keeps that status.
  • The qualification names one receiving use, scope, situation, window, and consuming decision.
  • Contribution, inputs/results, applicability, attributable burden, capability, support, authority/access, evidence, and source limits are checked as applicable.
  • No subject receives credit for another Method or whole arrangement’s result.
  • Local connection claims are independently testable and bounded.
  • A candidate-account verdict preserves unresolved A.3.1 identification conditions.
  • Whole allocation, synchronization, composition, provider, and architecture questions remain explicit rather than hidden in individual verdicts.
  • The result states whether to stop, reject, retain, or enter C.32.MWA.PP.