Coordinates with:A.6.M for module-interface relation repair; C.30, C.30.ASV, C.30.LCA, and C.30.ILC for architecture and selected-structure questions; C.33 and C.34 when scale-amenability material needs captured-structure, lost-structure, preservation, or correspondence adequacy before candidate use; C.35 for the generated or discovered result’s kind and adequacy for candidate use; C.32.P2S when scale-amenability pressure must continue through problem-to-structure architecturing; C.32.ACS when the pressure is represented as a distinct project criteria row; C.32 when scale preference informs candidate architecture generation; A.19.CPM when it supplies one input to explicit comparison; A.10 for source recovery and bounded reliance, G.6 for addressable provenance, and B.3 for a named assurance claim; G.5, G.9, and C.11 for selected-set, parity, and choice claims.
Boundary:C.31.ASAP governs architecture scale-preference claims. C.32.ACS governs criteria-set and criteria-row construction; A.19.CPM governs explicit comparison. C.31, C.31.RSA, C.29, C.18.1, C.19.1, G.5, G.9, and C.11 govern modularity-characteristic, reusable-structure accounting, mathematical-lens, scale-law, general method preference, selected-set, parity, and local-choice claims when those claims are being made.
Precision-restoration relation: source wording recovered by E.10, E.10.ARCH, or C.30.STRAT is governed by C.31.ASAP only when the recovered claim being made is architecture scale preference over a declared alternative set, scale variable, and scale window.