C.32.CONWAY:9 - Consequences

Positive consequence	Cost or trade-off
Architecture influence can guide synthesis without granting agency.	Actor, Work, changing, and influence relations must be grounded separately.
Exact pair rows can be reused across current network records.	Each reuse must preserve pair, relation occurrence, qualification window, and claim scope.
Inverse-Conway work produces explicit candidate changes and bounded mismatches.	Some familiar “transformer architecture” shorthand must be expanded into several facts.
Changed referent and transformed architecture stay recoverable.	A useful local frame may remain below exact-row assertion when the governor is missing or case facts remain unresolved.
Network recursion remains with E.18.NET.	One pair row cannot stand in for the whole network or its cross-flow relations.
Candidate architectures are checked against source-side production, testing, maintenance, evidence, and evolution arrangements.	Changing the influence-source side can be expensive; an attractive transformed-side candidate may therefore be rejected for the current evolution window.
Organization, Work, method, tool, and module claims are routed to their subject patterns instead of being hidden in an architecture-pair result.	This separation may require the practitioner to follow several separately governed exits before comparison. Mirroring supplies candidate pressure, not architecture adequacy; use C.29 when the claim is structural similarity or preservation.