C.32.MLAO:11 - SoTA-Echoing
These rows document transfers from source practice into C.32.MLAO. Each row names the part of the residual-reducing frame that uses the source’s contribution; none imports its source-domain ontology into FPF.
| Source to inspect | Why this source is load-bearing here | Transfer into C.32.MLAO | Concrete C.32.MLAO mutation | Blocked overread |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Current FPF architecture residual, criteria, eval, comparison, and level-recovery line: E.10, E.10.ARCH, C.30.STRAT, B.2.P, B.2, C.30.ILC, C.32.ACS, C.32.ACE, A.19.CPM, A.19.SelectorMechanism, C.11, G.5, C.29, C.31, C.31.ASAP, and architecture source section 15.3 | Current local law for interlevel and cross-scope architecture residuals. C.32.MLAO starts only after residual triage; use the applicable patterns to recover criteria, eval, stratification terms, whole reidentification, comparison, selection, choice, and selected-set result declaration. | Require C.30.STRAT recovery when stratification wording is ambiguous and B.2.P recovery when BOSC, MHT, MET, MFT, or emergence wording is ambiguous. Before residual-reducing candidates enter comparison, selection, choice, or selected-set result declaration, require declared holon-level refs or scope refs, selected structures, criteria rows, residual-bearing loci, preserved and lost structure, eval result refs when used, comparison inputs, and the pattern for the next question. | MultilevelArchitectureResidualOptimizationFrame@Project requires residual triage, declared holon-level refs or declared scope refs, selected structures, architecture-characteristic criteria rows, residual-bearing loci, residual-reducing candidates, optional C.29 lens-output ref, comparison input refs, pattern for the next question ref, and stop condition. | Same-scope structure conflict, generic complexity wording, untyped criteria, eval-result overread, untyped stratification terms, untyped BOSC or MHT triggers, local comparison work, local selection work, and untyped optimization phrases require the exact subject predicates before C.32.MLAO admits the frame. |
Vanchurin, Wolf, Katsnelson, and Koonin, Towards a Theory of Evolution as Multilevel Learning (https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14602); Wolf, Katsnelson, and Koonin, Physical foundations of biological complexity (https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09975); Akhtyrchenko, Katsnelson, and Ustyuzhanin, Directing Open-Ended Evolution ... via Multi-Scale Path Divergence, submitted 2026-06-12 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17091) | Current source line for multilevel residual and scale-dependent frustration as a mathematical lens. The 2026 MSPD paper is current because it makes scale-dependent frustration explicit and computable while still being a lens over a substrate. | Use frustration and multiscale divergence as optional C.29-backed lens outputs for residual-bearing loci across declared holon-level refs or declared scope refs. | C.32.MLAO adds c29LensOutputRef?, residual-bearing locus, preserved and lost structure, comparison input refs, and pattern for the next question ref so any comparison has its pattern for the next question named. | Source-domain ontology stays outside architecture; a scalar output must be interpreted as pressure, loss, or residual over selected structures before a receiving comparison or choice pattern can use it. |
Evolutionary architecture: Ford, Parsons, Kua, and Sadalage, Building Evolutionary Architectures, 2nd ed. (https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/building-evolutionary-architectures/9781492097532/) | Current practitioner architecture line for guided incremental change over declared architecture characteristics, affected selected structures, and feedback from source-side fitness functions. | Residual-reducing candidates must name the new burden they introduce and the stop or reopen condition; source-side fitness-function practice is restored as ACE eval programs over ACS criteria rows. | Candidate-family table includes bounded exception, evidence scope, interface grammar, control structure, and work-method scope; consequences require new burden, source-return triggers, and receiving use for eval results. | A local eval improvement needs an architecture interpretation before a comparison, selection, or choice pattern for the next question can use it. |
TRIZ ideality and laws of technical-system evolution, read with C.19.1 BLP | Older heuristic line: systems tend toward more useful function with less cost, harm, and support apparatus; BLP supplies FPF scale-amenability discipline for general bearers. | Use ideality and scale amenability to generate residual-reducing candidates, not to select them. | Frame adds architectureIdealityPressureRef? and scaleAmenabilityPolicyRef?; Solution adds ideality and BLP discipline; anti-pattern table adds IdealityNoBurden. | Removing a part, consolidating functions, or choosing a universal bearer is not residual reduction unless selected structures, characteristics, new burden, and scale boundary are declared. |
Multi-objective and hardware-aware NAS: Elsken, Metzen, and Hutter 2019 (https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v20/18-598.html); Sukthanker et al., v3 revised 2025-02-04 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18213); Sinha et al. 2024 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12403) | Current architecture-search line where functional graph candidates are judged against hardware, latency, cost, and transfer constraints; useful as a general co-design lesson beyond ML. | Residual-reducing candidates that change functional structure must also name feasible bearers at affected scopes. | Frame adds functionBearerFeasibilityRef?; Solution adds functional-bearer feasibility discipline; candidate-family table adds repairFunctionBearerGap. | A functional graph, resource score, or Pareto member is not residual reduction if no admitted bearer can carry the function. |
Architecture trade-off practice and Software Architecture: The Hard Parts (https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/software-architecture-the/9781492086888/) | Best current practitioner line for no-best-practice architecture decisions and explicit trade-off analysis in hard architecture problems. | Frame each candidate as residual reduced plus burden created, not as a universal best answer. | Candidate rows require residualReduced, newBurden, preservedStructure, and lostOrHiddenStructure; final choice requires C.11 or C.32.PAD. | A trade-off scenario, ranking, or preferred decomposition is not a decision inside C.32.MLAO. |
DORA loosely coupled teams, last updated 2025-10-20 (https://dora.dev/capabilities/loosely-coupled-teams/), DORA trunk-based development (https://dora.dev/capabilities/trunk-based-development/), and Team Topologies key concepts (https://teamtopologies.com/key-concepts) | Current socio-technical practice for independent change, testing, deployment, small batches, dependency reduction, and fast flow. It is load-bearing because many residuals concern organization relations, proposed Systems or assignments, ordinary work or procedure organization, actual Work, direct responsibility relations, and coordination structures, not only software modules. | Admit organization, local-kind, separate System-classification, assignment, responsibility, coordination, Method, plan, and actual-Work residuals only when their selected structures, direct predicates, affected scopes, and modal or actual status are recoverable. | Worked cases include clinical triage, AI-agent review, and a Method family; candidate families include mediation, Method or plan scope, interface grammar, and control structure. | Organization-design observations enter C.32.MLAO only after mapping to Systems and relations. Assignment supplies no responsibility, capability, function bearing, or Work, and observations supply no module, evidence, assurance, or decision claims. |
Design-space and architecture-spread research: Shaw and Petre 2024 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18502); Cortellessa et al. 2024 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.19171) | Current research showing that useful alternatives need a design-space or architecture-space view, not only objective-space scores. | Preserve plural residual-reducing candidates when residuals shift differently across structures or scopes. | The frame preserves candidate plurality as C.32 input; use G.5 for selected-set result declaration. Use spread, diversity, or objective-space output only after naming the architecture differences it reveals. | Candidate preference still depends on declared architecture characteristics, losses, and a pattern for the next question. |
| C.18 archive and front stewardship plus C.19 explore-exploit governance | Current FPF pattern line for open-ended search, NQD, OEE, archive, front, pool treatment, and stepping-stone retention. | Treat NQD and OEE as generation and retention support for residual-reducing candidates, not as architecture selection. | Frame fields add dynamicFrontOrArchiveRef?, nqdOrOeeSupportRef?, steppingStoneRefs?, and evolutionWindowRef; Solution adds dynamic optimum discipline. | Archive membership, front membership, retained stepping stone, or pool treatment is not architecture adequacy or decision. |
Conway’s law, mirroring, DORA loosely coupled teams, Team Topologies, and current C.32.CONWAY | Current practice line for residuals where one typed Work, communication, tool, method, deployment, evidence, selected-structure, or architecture-side source no longer fits the transformed-side architecture content needed for the changed referent. | Treat architecture-influence correspondence mismatch as a residual-reducing synthesis problem, not as actor identity, Work attribution, transformation participation, or transformed-side architecture settlement. | Frame field architectureInfluenceCorrespondenceRef? points to C.32.CONWAY; candidate-family table adds repairArchitectureInfluenceCorrespondence; Solution keeps the two exact C.30 architecture sides, changed referent, actual transformation when claimed, and influence relation separate while preparing influence-source-side, transformed-side, joint, and bounded-mismatch candidates. | A correspondence residual is repaired only after the shifted burden, affected structures, characteristic pressure, exact influence basis, and exception cost are named. |
Source-currentness boundary. Use each source row only for the frame field, candidate-family row, discipline paragraph, or boundary named in that row. Recheck the row when a cited paper, book edition, DORA or Team Topologies page, FPF pattern for the next question, project residual, selected structure, criteria row, or evolution window changes. If the source no longer supports the concrete mutation, lower it to background lineage and keep the residual frame only when local residual triage, selected structures, criteria rows, new burden, and pattern for the next question remain recoverable.