C.32.MWA.PP:1 - Problem Frame

The practitioner receives identified Methods or candidate accounts, their intended effects and any qualified connections. These may be explained in an ordinary practice account or a typical transformation-flow network. The task is to construct and compare their performance and support arrangement while preserving the supplied contributions, conditions and unresolved gaps.

The pattern considers Methods, Work, descriptions, capability, tools, variants and simultaneous contributions at several scales. Recover the subject of each project, process or case account under A.15.6 before comparing structures. Several useful structures and descriptions can be connected without sharing a subject or aligning one-for-one.

A project still needs decisions. It must choose which provisional results may be used, which Work may overlap, where authority stays, which support arrangement is acceptable, and where burden moves. The comparison must preserve the several structures while remaining small enough to act on.

When continuing development is the supplied practice, preserve its full contribution: noticing an emerging difficulty or possibility, forming a problem, constructing a worthwhile reachable change, arranging and enacting it, then making a further development choice from the changed position, including after success. Consolidation, ordinary work or ending a particular line can be justified continuations. C.32.MWA.PP receives that practice and arranges its performance; it does not construct the whole development network by default or reduce it to acquiring or introducing a known Method.