C.32.MWA.PP:3 - Forces
| Force | Tension that can change the arrangement |
|---|---|
| Subject integrity and local adaptation | A supplied Method needs its operative conditions preserved, while local work may require a different input, support condition or variation. |
| Reuse and specialization | Shared preparation and infrastructure can save effort, while subject judgement and local knowledge can remain non-substitutable. |
| Personal mastery and supplied results | A provider can obtain a correct result without developing the receiver’s ability to obtain it. Some uses need one; others need both. |
| Local autonomy and joint consequences | Local decisions can use timely knowledge, while their effects can consume shared resources or defeat another participant’s contribution. |
| Continuing work and development | Development can improve future capability while temporarily reducing the same performers’ current contribution. |
| Common responsibility and distributed provision | One carrier can arrange access and maintain continuity without employing or performing every specialty. |
| Actual authority and useful initiative | Someone can recognize and solve a problem without having permission to commit the affected people, resources or Systems. |
| Cheap intelligence and costly enactment | AI can make search or decisions cheaper while experiments, transitions, attention, integration or physical work remain scarce. |
| Comparative completeness and decision cost | Missing connections can reverse a decision, while a full model of every relation would cost more than a bounded adequate repair. |
Method-architecture comparison also preserves simultaneous contribution without losing real order, and useful co-use without inventing a Method whole. Several structures can expose different conflicts, while views that cannot change the choice add only cost. Proposed relations are useful design inputs but cannot be reported as obtaining practice.