C.32.MWA.PP:4.11 - Return the architecture decision
Keep the description proportional to the receiving use. A compact decision can suffice when its reader can recover the contribution and the condition that changes reliance.
| Result position | Required content |
|---|---|
| decision boundary | Obtaining or possible-future practice, result, situation, configuration, window, authority, and use. |
| retained subjects | Methods, candidate accounts, supplied network, qualified local connections, unchanged statuses and exact missing contributions. |
| selected structures | Exact structure names, direct relations, truth statuses, correspondences, losses, and evidence. |
| alternatives | At least two serious syntheses and the named relations by which they differ. |
| comparison | Shared and recurring work, qualification, combined peak and total demand, simultaneous and first–then conditions, allocation, capacity, provider/access, authority, failure routes, evidence, moved burdens, and causal-use limits as applicable. |
| decision | Selected/rejected synthesis, basis and rule, accepted losses, preserved constraints, and remaining rivals. |
| continuation, where it changes the use | Conditions for relying on or reconsidering the decision; selected implementation or trial Work, exact receiving contribution and sufficient supplier, observations, stopped dependent actions and history-preserving recovery. |
Practitioners choose which direct relations should hold for one result, which structures expose the conflict, and who carries the burden. Co-used Methods can remain plural; a proposed architecture can guide a trial without being reported as already real.