C.37.CF:4.5 - Return a bounded revision result

State the inspected variants, the content/form contrasts they actually support, observations, losses, uncertainty and next decision. Distinguish a demonstrated local difference, no distinguishing result in this probe, an unavailable contrast and a confounded comparison.

Compare extraction effort and receiving value separately from structural amount through C.11.CRC and C.11. Retain the sufficient incumbent when the proposed change supplies no worthwhile gain.

Return a content correction to A.3.2.DE, a contradicted maintained claim to A.3.1.CC, and selection evidence to C.37 or C.37.MP. Use A.3.1.WT for representative enactment evidence and C.11.MV for a Method-worth decision. A causal claim needs its own justified research design and inference basis; neither this table nor an attractive explanation supplies it.

An ordinary comparison can remain short prose. When another decision will rely on it, retain the candidate versions, receiving use, observations and inference limits as an identifiable account, with the source conditions that reopen it.