C.39.MF:0 - Use This When
Use this pattern when a project says that its “methodology”, “process”, “workflow”, or “way of working” must change, but the decision subject is still ambiguous. The live concern may be one Method, several related Methods, an established Method family, a temporary comparison grouping, or something else such as a tool, capability, support arrangement, description, resource, or project System.
Begin with the result that is missing, late, unsafe, or too costly and the representative Work in which that result matters. Recover the Methods and candidate accounts already visible there before choosing the level of focus.
The first useful move is to compare four possible focus classes: one Method; an established family or project-local grouping; named Method relations; and a non-Method return. The practical gain is that later repertoire, qualification, or architecture Work receives the smallest subject it can act on without inventing a Method or a composite.
Do not use C.39.MF merely because one tool failed, one practitioner lacks capability, one document is incomplete, or one project, process, or case view is inconvenient. Return that question to its direct subject unless changing a Method would change the receiving result.
C.39.MF:0.1 - Working Distinctions
| Name used here | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Method | A reusable way of obtaining or preserving a result, identified under A.3.1 for the relevant participant meanings, applicability, and limits. |
| candidate Method account | An episteme that states a possible reusable way of doing while one or more Method-identification conditions remain open. The account is not the Method. |
| established Method family | Identified Methods connected by an independently governed family classification or membership basis. Shared use or resemblance is insufficient. |
| project-local grouping | A temporary set of identified Methods and candidate accounts collected by a stated criterion for one comparison or selector use. Its label creates no family or membership fact. |
| Method-relation focus | Named Methods and candidate accounts plus the relation kinds whose truth could change the project decision. It need not contain a composite whole. |
| project, process, or case account | A description whose direct subject is recovered from its claims under A.15.6 and C.2.1. It is a U.View only through its own E.17.0 conformance relation. Several accounts can concern one Work; they can instead concern a plan, Method, result, or other subject. |
| non-Method return | A result that redirects the decision to the actual subject, relation, and next useful question while naming what observation would reopen the Method question. |