C.39.WA:2 - Problem

A correct contribution can become the basis of a conclusion about a larger result through an unnoticed change of subject. “This is mathematical content” becomes “this explains mathematics”; a valid example becomes the explanation of a Method; a collection of individually useful Methods becomes an account of a discipline.

Three things have changed in that move: the subject being explained, the property being judged, and the scope supported by the grounds. A later reviewer can inherit the substituted question from the author’s outline or earlier positive judgement. Further checking of the same fragment then leaves the original need unanswered.

The missing work is constructive as well as evaluative. The author has to obtain the relations, general grounds and choices that organize the subject, and explain how they govern its parts. The reviewer needs an independently grounded expectation of that account. Acceptance must preserve the relation between the received contribution and the encompassing request.