fpf.tools
Jump to text
On this page
Copy and source
Original source · lines 86146–86159
Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-14 19:58:00 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-14 19:58:38 UTC · last check 2026-10-15 02:30:07 UTC

C.40.PC:7 - Conformance Checklist

A conforming problem/contribution account:

  1. MUST identify the subject of the proposed change, receiving use, horizon, and relevant protected conditions.
  2. MUST distinguish the inadequate or foregone result, why it matters, and the proposed contribution.
  3. MUST distinguish a supported worthwhile problem, an attributed or disputed claim, an unconfirmed hypothesis, and rejection where those outcomes are live.
  4. MUST preserve material contrary evidence, affected-System consequences, and burdens that can reverse the worth claim.
  5. MUST state an inspectable acceptance expectation without reporting actual acceptance or achieved benefit.
  6. MUST distinguish a proposed promise from an existing promise and both from commitment, provision, and fulfilment.
  7. MUST expose the evidence or hypothesis linking the contribution to the problem and the next discriminating question.
  8. MUST NOT infer need from novelty, a supplier offer, or solution feasibility, or reject a supported receiving problem solely because solution evidence is missing.
  9. MUST return to the next missing result or stop; a direction, recommendation, choice, or intervention is not required to complete this account.