CUST.2:4.5 - Recombine the decisions around the customer result

Follow the proposed dispositions together. Does the new semantic mapping still fit the standard interface? Does the common adapter require access forbidden in the private environment? Does the local report create a new monthly obligation? Can the same specialist provide both the new support and existing commitments?

Resolve these interactions before promising the combination. CUST.7 supplies the complete burden comparison; CUST.8 supplies the effect on existing consumers. A qualified engineering result can settle technical feasibility while the commercial or operating choice remains open.

Identify the actual decision holder and enabling conditions for consequential changes. The decision arrangement in CUST.1:4.3 can be used directly here. If the field practitioner cannot admit a shared component or commit support, obtain those decisions rather than interpreting silence as approval.