E.17.AUD.OOTD:10 - Rationale

The point of this pattern is not to create a second architecture of views, faces, carriers, epistemes, or downstream decision texts. It is narrower: one publication unit can become misleading even when every single sentence looks locally acceptable.

A.6.P, A.7, E.10, and F.18 already keep kinds, distinctions, and naming precise. C.2.1 already identifies the exact entity participant of one claim-bearing episteme. This pattern adds only the missing publication-unit discipline: choose the least-cost honest architecture for a bounded readable unit, make its primary subject or section-level subjects and moves visible, and keep downstream use and outside work explicit. It borrows EntityOfConcern only through the exact conditional projection in 4.1.b and does not extend that ontology.

The pattern also stays intentionally close to E.14 and E.19. Recognition comes first through a manager-usable entry block and one ordinary natural-language declaration; the six prompts remain an optional diagnostic. Heavier declaration comes only after the ordinary declaration already holds and a named receiving use consumes the added fields.