| Public mnemonic usefulness vs ontology truth | A U.* name can improve discovery; it can also advertise a false governed object. |
| Root stability vs dependent reuse | Some dependent distinctions deserve durable names but retain identity through one root settlement. |
| C.3 typed reasoning vs U-kind governance | U.Kind is an admitted meta-kind and C.3 kinds are its individuals; this does not give each such individual its own public U.* subject-kind name. U.SubkindOf is separately admitted as a same-individual dependent relation kind under U.Relation. Every other durable subject-kind proposal still needs its own E.24.UK result. |
| Kernel parsimony vs expressive pattern language | FPF needs useful names, but new U-kinds are expensive and must not replace slots and relations. |
| Host and ToC structure vs prose nuance | A false U.* in a title, filename, heading, or ToC row is stronger than a false prose occurrence. |