Table of Contents
Search for the asset decision or result you need. Dependencies identify useful result relations, not a mandatory sequence.
Public units
| Unit | Reader use |
|---|---|
| Engineering Asset Management Principles Framework Readme | Follow connected asset decisions and their changed-condition returns. |
| Citation | Cite the framework or a particular pattern contribution. |
| Preface | Understand the asset-value problem, the related Methods and their limits. |
| Cross-Pattern Applications | Follow one asset and its different choice in a constrained programme. |
| Source Responsibility and References | Recover the source contributions and qualified specialist returns. |
| Framework Boundary and Refresh | Find the scope, ordinary stops and reasons to reopen a result. |
Part A - Outcomes and the Asset Information Basis
| § | ID & Title | Status | Keywords & Search Queries | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EAM.1 - Frame the Engineered Assets and Required Outcomes | Stable | Keywords: single asset, asset System, portfolio, service, horizon. Query: “Which options should we compare for this asset or portfolio, for what service and period?” Agree the asset options, required service, comparison period and decision maker. | EAM.2, EAM.3; FPF A.1.SCR |
| 2 | EAM.2 - Relate Assets to Strategy, Services, and Required Capability | Stable | Keywords: strategy, service, stakeholder, required capability. Query: “What required contribution must the assets support?” Relate proposed asset work to an actual service outcome and its authority. | EAM.1, EAM.4, EAM.6; OPS.1 |
| 3 | EAM.3 - Establish the Asset Information and Configuration Basis | Stable | Keywords: unit identity, configuration, effectivity, source applicability. Query: “Which information applies to this asset and comparison?” Resolve the answer-changing mismatch with a sufficient information basis. | SYSE.13; EAM.1, EAM.5; FPF A.10 |
Part B - Demand, Condition, Capacity, and Interdependence
| § | ID & Title | Status | Keywords & Search Queries | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | EAM.4 - Assess Demand and Service Need for Asset Decisions | Stable | Keywords: demand, components, drivers, coincident peak, scenario, forecast, service requirement. Query: “What service will be needed under the conditions that matter?” Construct compatible demand scenarios and distinguish their evidence from the mandated service. | EAM.2, EAM.6; OPS.1 |
| 5 | EAM.5 - Assess Asset Condition and Performance | Stable | Keywords: condition, performance, diagnosis, exposure, forecast. Query: “What do observed condition and delivered performance support?” Return a qualified account for the asset decision. | MNT.4, MNT.6; OPS.18; EAM.3 |
| 6 | EAM.6 - Assess Asset Capacity, Resilience, and Interdependence | Stable | Keywords: capacity, bottleneck, resilience, shared dependency, usable reserve, recovery intervals. Query: “Can the assets support service during normal use and disturbance?” Derive lost contributions and follow available service and reserve through recovery. | EAM.4, EAM.5; OPS.10, OPS.11 |
Part C - Alternatives, Conflicts, Combinations, and Timing
| § | ID & Title | Status | Keywords & Search Queries | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | EAM.7 - Generate Ways to Supply an Asset-Dependent Service | Stable | Keywords: acquire, modify, lease, service option, functional alternative. Query: “Which acquisition or change can provide the needed contribution?” Generate comparable qualified alternatives with their whole burden. | EAM.2, EAM.3, EAM.6; SYSE.5 |
| 8 | EAM.8 - Generate Maintenance, Renewal, and Retirement Alternatives | Stable | Keywords: continue, maintain, renew, replace, retire, later intervention, horizon, residual value. Query: “Which continued-use or change option is worth considering?” Construct supported policies with dated consequences and a compatible ending premise. | EAM.5, EAM.9; MNT.6, MNT.7; FIN.6, FIN.7; FPF C.11 |
| 9 | EAM.9 - Compare Asset Alternatives and Reconcile Decisions When They Conflict | Stable | Keywords: asset alternatives, lifetime consequences, conflicting choices, funding, service mandate, simultaneous work. Query: “Which asset alternative is supported, and what unresolved conflict remains?” Compare eligible asset alternatives and identify any conflicting service, funding or work condition and the decision needed to resolve it. | EAM.6, EAM.10, EAM.11, EAM.12; FPF C.32.MWA |
| 10 | EAM.10 - Compare Engineered-Asset Portfolio Combinations | Stable | Keywords: capital allocation, indivisible options, portfolio, combination, shared work, joint consequences. Query: “Which eligible asset combination should receive the allocation?” Construct whole consequences and compare programmes under the dated binding conditions. | EAM.7, EAM.8, EAM.9, EAM.11; FIN.9; FPF C.11 |
| 11 | EAM.11 - Time Asset Interventions and Manage Dependencies | Stable | Keywords: whole outage, dependencies, calendar, preparation, contingency. Query: “Can the selected programme be completed while preserving service?” Construct a supported calendar or expose the limiting prerequisite. | EAM.6, EAM.9, EAM.10; MNT.7, MNT.15; OPS.10 |
Part D - Decisions, Outcomes, and Continuing Practice
| § | ID & Title | Status | Keywords & Search Queries | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | EAM.12 - Integrate Specialist Results for an Asset Recommendation or Decision | Stable | Keywords: recommendation, specialist result, decision, authorization. Query: “What supported answer is requested and who makes the asset decision?” Integrate applicable results and distinguish advice from actual authorization. | EAM.1, EAM.9, EAM.10, EAM.11; FPF A.6.F, A.10 |
| 13 | EAM.13 - Track Realized Outcomes and Reconsider Asset Plans | Stable | Keywords: realized outcome, variance, attribution, revision, changed premise. Query: “What has actually changed, and should the asset plan be retained or revised?” Compare obtained outcomes with the decision premises at the same scope. | EAM.3, EAM.12; FPF A.10, C.16 |
| 14 | EAM.14 - Decide Whether and How to Change the Asset-Management System | Stable | Keywords: roles, information flow, responsibility, management system, arrangement. Query: “What in the organization of asset work prevents timely, supported decisions?” Compare feasible changes to responsibilities, information flow or support with keeping the current arrangement. | EAM.13, EAM.15, EAM.16; OPS.11; OCE.9; FPF C.11.DUA |
| 15 | EAM.15 - Decide Whether and How to Change Engineering Asset-Management Methods | Stable | Keywords: Method, reusable operations, comparison, variant, trial, refresh. Query: “Should this way of making asset decisions be retained or changed?” Compare ways of answering the same asset question, including the effort of applying and maintaining them. | EAM.10, EAM.13; ME.15; FPF C.11.DUA |
| 16 | EAM.16 - Deliberately Continue and Change Engineering Asset-Management Culture | Stable | Keywords: culture, transmission, use, recognition, selection, retention, branch. Query: “Which asset-management practices do people use, and should they continue or change?” Establish what the evidence supports and compare continuation, change, a qualified branch or stopping. | EAM.14, EAM.15; ME.17; FPF C.36 |