A.6.REL:11.2 - Representation and implementation stress tests
This pattern uses these sources to test whether the selected ontological distinctions can be represented and used. They do not determine what relation occurrences exist or how they are identified.
| Representation or implementation line | Distinction tested | Bounded use in A.6.REL |
|---|---|---|
TypeDB 3.x links statement and current relation model | A query can expose a relation variable with named source-language role players, while shorthand remains available when the represented relation instance need not be referenced. That source term denotes neither an FPF system-role kind nor a system-role assignment. | Adapt as a representation stress test; reject as an ontology source. Sections 4.2, 4.5, and 4.6 preserve a readable direct relation before explicit individuation. TypeDB demonstrates one implementable representation; it does not establish the FPF relation kind, obtaining condition, or identity rule. |
| RDF 1.2 Concepts, Candidate Recommendation Snapshot, 7 April 2026 | Distinguishes a proposition expressed by a triple term, assertion of a triple, and reifiers used for further statements. | Adapt as a representation stress test; reject graph syntax and reifier identity as world-side identity sources. Sections 4.4 and 5.3 apply that distinction to proposition, assertion, and reifier separation. |
The worked cases expose both boundaries outside information-system projects.