LDR.5:4.2 - Build an account that can change the proposed question

Let participants describe what they tried, what happened, what mattered and what they think explains it. Connect their accounts around the same event or anticipated use. Distinguish observations, interpretations, desired consequences and proposed remedies. Ask where the accounts disagree and what difference that disagreement makes to action.

For example, several delayed releases can support a request for more developer discipline. A maintainer may show that each release contains accepted changes that no one has committed to integrate. A user may reveal that frequent releases matter less than a stable version for an existing installation. These facts can change the question from accelerating everybody’s work to deciding which contribution the project should undertake and how it can obtain it.

Use B.5.SD when the relationship between claims still needs substantive construction. A technical claim needs the relevant domain method. OCE.2 and OCE.10 can supply investigation of actual organizational work and participation where those are the objects. Do not substitute an attitude diagnosis for an unavailable design or resource answer.

Return the account to participants in terms they can correct. Ask them to apply it to the next consequential choice, not merely affirm that it sounds right. A difference that still changes the choice remains open. A documented account can hold the question across time and participants; writing it does not make it shared or true.