MNT.Sources:1 - Source roles and scope of reliance
This framework is an original selective synthesis, not a replacement edition or complete translation of a Guide, standard or paper. Source accounts contribute to specific decisions; their complete procedures, derivations and jurisdictional provisions remain with the original works.
| Source return | Contribution used here | Limit that changes reliance |
|---|---|---|
| NASA, Reliability-Centered Maintenance Guide, 2008, task-selection discussion | Historical task-applicability and effectiveness reasoning in MNT.2. | This is not a current universal standard or a universal interval source. |
| Arts, Boute, Loeys and van Staden, Fifty years of maintenance optimization, 2025, EJOR 322(3), 725–739, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.07.002 | Coupled physical-failure and decision reasoning in MNT.2/3; support remains part of feasible response. | Models and the source’s data-oriented maturity account do not rank every maintenance practice. |
| Dadfarnia, Sharp and Herrmann, Comprehensive evaluations of condition monitoring-based technologies in industrial maintenance, 2025, JMS 82, 449–477 | Receiving-use consequences in MNT.4/13/14. | Heterogeneous study evidence does not supply a universal effectiveness estimate. |
| Orošnjak, Saretzky and Kedziora, Prescriptive Maintenance, 2025, Applied Sciences 15(15), 8507 | The condition-to-action question used in MNT.6. | The inspected abstract and synthesis do not warrant adopting a particular deployed algorithm. |
| Gan and colleagues, preparation-aware scheduling, 2026 issue, first online July 2025 | Preparation overlap as a candidate choice in MNT.5/7/15. | The inspected abstract’s scheduling model supplies neither plant-wide proof nor these case times. |
| Kasuya and Jin, flexible decision timing, 2026, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2026.112528 | Operating-rate and maintenance-timing alternatives in MNT.7/14. | The inspected abstract/introduction concerns modeled systems, not universal field transfer. |
| GFMAM, The Maintenance Framework, second edition, 2021, §6 | Breadth of task, support, information and programme concerns. | Its subject inventory is not copied as a compulsory Method sequence. |
| IAM, An Anatomy of Asset Management, version 4, 2024, §§7.5.9 and 7.7.5 | Maintained function and the relation to value-oriented decisions about an individual asset, an asset System or a portfolio. | Comparing continued use, renewal, replacement, repurposing or withdrawal by value, costs, risks and service effects is broader than MNT’s maintained-functioning result; portfolio scale is not compulsory. |
| OSHA, 29 CFR 1910.147 | A bounded example of operative energy-control, verification and restoration requirements. | Actual use requires the applicable current rules, scope and equipment procedure. |
| EASA, September 2025 Part-145 guidance, 145.A.50 and GM1 145.A.50(a) | Distinguishing specified maintenance certification from a broader use claim in MNT.11. | This is a dated illustration; the edition notice identifies missing later requirements. |
| CASA, maintenance-activities risk profile: Fatigue, 24 April 2026 | A human-performance counterexample to attention-only responses in MNT.9/16. | An aviation account does not supply a universal threshold or quantified causal effect. |
The Architectural Reference explains the connected language and the consequences of these sources for its use.