STR.16:7 - Conformance Checklist

Use these questions to examine the construction, not as a separate form required before every ordinary allocation.

• Can a participant explain the next useful result of each selected undertaking and distinguish its scientific, product, capability or cultural grounds where those differ?
• Does each claimed dependency identify the receiving action, usable result, timing and qualified alternative or return?
• Do shared and branch-specific support alternatives include production, application, maintenance, coordination and failure response?
• Does the resource account count each actual supplying effort once, every receiving effort where it occurs, and each scarce bearer in the relevant windows?
• Are payments, capacity, assigned costs, permissions and accepted commitments kept distinct?
• Does the comparison retain protected conditions, meaningful characteristic scales, uncertainty, displaced work and the actual accepted trade-off?
• Can the next performer identify what is now authorized and what remains conditional?
• Does a changed shared contribution reopen its affected uses without needlessly stopping independent branches?
• After success, can the organization identify a worthwhile next development question without mistaking routine repetition for a new capability?

These questions can establish the intelligibility and conditional coherence of the proposal. Empirical effectiveness, safety, research truth, learning transfer and actual organizational capability need their own evidence.