fpf.tools
Jump to text
On this page
Copy and source
Original source · lines 216–231
Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-14 19:58:00 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-14 19:58:38 UTC · last check 2026-10-15 00:05:10 UTC

STR.Reference:8 - Conformance Checklist - Correct use of the connected language

  • The strategic subject, receiving question, horizon and holder of the actual choice are clear.
  • An unsettled problem, a direction, an explained obtaining way and an examined exploratory intermediate remain different results; a sufficient result permits direct entry.
  • A serious feasible rival, including continuation or stop, is not omitted to favour novelty.
  • Evidence and comparisons concern the same options, configuration and conditions.
  • Further inquiry has an attainable decision contribution worth its full burden.
  • Whole commitments preserve material constraints, affected interests and displaced work.
  • A retained alternative, joint-use selection, recommendation and authorization stay distinct.
  • Capability, permission and financing claims come from their actual qualified contributors.
  • Reconsideration reaches the affected decision in time; independent useful work is preserved.
  • Method-worth and cultural-continuation claims retain their separate basis.

These questions connect the pattern-specific answers. Reuse a qualified local result when the combination does not change its conditions; inspect the whole configuration when shared constraints can invalidate otherwise adequate parts.