A.1.1:9 - Consequences

Benefits. Teams can compare model-use boundaries without inventing an enclosing whole. Competing models over one subsystem and one model across several loci become expressible through complete structure bases. Local vocabulary, rules, inferences, units, evidence use, and status use remain recoverable through subject patterns rather than a context proxy.

Costs. A load-bearing structure claim must recover three direct relation families, exact applied constraints, and one question/action/stop-or-return frame. Semantic transfer sometimes stops at a subject pattern that still cannot express the claim without a generic context field; that stop preserves the known participants and relations while the missing predicate is repaired.

Limits. A.1.1 does not decide model truth, local system-role-kind classification, system-role-assignment occurrence or state, a relation among system-role kinds, rule validity, measurement, status, evidence, claim-scope membership, reference-scheme construction, system parthood, Work performance, release authority, or publication currentness. Its own predicates define model applicability, actual model use, and model-expression coherence; the joint organization is selected only when the required direct claims are available.