A.1.SCR:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and Exact Repairs

Anti-pattern	Why it fails	Repair
Complete A.1 test before the decision is known	Classification work may change nothing.	State what depends on systemhood; take the subject-pattern exit when it does not.
Pattern list without an actor/change bearer	The reader still cannot act.	Name the exact subject and concrete decision.
Temporary reading treated as a kind	Evaluation position becomes ontology.	Keep one exact `U.Entity` under an admitted kind test.
Unknown as a third ontic state	Missing information becomes world-side indeterminacy.	Name the missing input and blocked decision.
Neighbor bundle	Different identity laws disappear.	Return the subject first, then separately governed claims needed now.
Physical-realization identity	Co-location or one embodiment merges kinds.	Apply each identity rule and relation governor.
Project designation inferred	Recognition or affectedness is mistaken for designation as the project system-of-interest.	Name the plan or decision; test any system-role kind and system-role assignment separately.
Software service treated as system	Source-domain metonymy silently chooses a bearer.	Begin in A.6.P, name the exact referent, and enter here only for a system-dependent claim.