A.1.STM:8 - Conformance checklist

ID	Check
`CC-A1-STM-1`	The intended final result and the first unsupported logical dependency are readable without decoding a technical record.
`CC-A1-STM-2`	Expected outside use and the project-system boundary are stated before internal architecture is justified; the actual runtime transformation of an exact environment or input referent and any system participation remain separately governed, and feedback may reopen the earlier hypotheses.
`CC-A1-STM-3`	Project system-of-interest identity, project designation, system-role-kind interpretation, and system-role assignment remain separate.
`CC-A1-STM-4`	Project Work, an admitted project-level network selection or Plain provisional map, and one minimal case placement retain their own identities.
`CC-A1-STM-5`	Backward attention, forward actuality, didactic order, Work order, and direct subject relations are not substituted for one another.
`CC-A1-STM-6`	Every local answer is one exact assertion under its subject predicate, with the pattern retained only as a locator, or a truthful stop.
`CC-A1-STM-7`	A case states four things in ordinary language: the exact subject or claim; the bounded references and direct claims needed to answer this closure question; the separately governed closure basis; and one named downstream receiving use that remains outside the closed case.
`CC-A1-STM-8`	An admitted network has independently identified members, exact obtaining cross-member relations, applied constraints, a use frame, and complete endpoint bindings; otherwise the map stays provisional.
`CC-A1-STM-9`	Expected environmental effect, actual runtime transformation and system participation, production, identity inception, completion, later change, and use are separately grounded; required behaviour is not actuality, and no not-yet-existing system is transformed.
`CC-A1-STM-10`	Evidence is bound to its claim, assurance is limited to a named reliance use, and changed grounds reopen only the smallest affected answer.