A.10:4.4 - Build a descriptive evidence-provenance path
The minimum A.10 path records only what the bounded use needs:
| Field | Required content |
|---|---|
| Relied-on claim | The selected claim or proposition in one identified C.2.1 episteme; a separate target claim when the evidence use distinguishes it |
| Bounded use | The ordinary orientation, learning, action, or reliance use being judged, and its premise, reference, decision-use, operation-argument, or other direct use relation. Add an exact later U.Work occurrence only when it is independently current. |
| Sources and carriers | Selected source epistemes and editions; publication occurrences, forms, carriers, and faces when material; transformations; and direct provenance/citation relations |
| Work and bindings | Only independently current dated U.Work, its complete basis, and the performers, Methods, resources, direct relations, and A.6.1 bindings used by the claim. A claimed Work-to-value link also needs an A.6.1 application binding, one local A.15.PROD claim, or a direct subject predicate defined by its own pattern. |
| Result rule | For each asserted local result, the pattern that defines or tests it and its distinct result episteme |
| Time/currentness | Source and result windows plus G.11 currentness when currentness affects use |
| Challenge | A live rival explanation when it needs discrimination; a locally grounded, plausible unsupported use when excluding it changes reliance; an available contest/redress path when a party is affected; and the stop or reopen condition applicable to this use |
Graph nodes retain their admitted kinds. Each edge cites one independently established direct relation; no generic evidences, verifiedBy, validatedBy, measuredBy, producedByWork, or criterion-participant relation is minted as a fallback. A project may label display edges for navigation, but the label has no ontic force.