A.12:6 - Conformance Checklist

Check	Requirement
`CC-A12-1`	A self-action or passive change account names the proposed acting participant and changed subject separately. When the precise frame is used, it identifies one exact continuing `changedSubjectRef` by that referent’s identity rule and requires `actingEntityRef`; before A.1 recognition it keeps the exact disposition or blocker and leaves `actingSystemRef` unfilled, and after recognition that optional position identifies the same entity under `U.System`. A filled `transformationRef` identifies an A.3.4 bounded change of that same `changedSubjectRef`. `ReflexiveSplit@Context` carries only acting and changed part positions; a companion acting-side frame carries this recognition boundary when needed.
`CC-A12-2`	A Reflexive Split case identifies distinct exact entity parts or subsystems inside one containing holon, and each position has its independently obtaining direct part relation. Temporal phases keep their phase identity rules; assignments use A.2.1; parthood uses A.14 or the exact part-relation rule; descriptions use C.2.1; selected structures use A.22. None fills an A.12 part position merely by being nearby.
`CC-A12-3`	A.12 does not create `U.Transformer`, `U.Boundary`, or `U.Interaction`.
`CC-A12-4`	Bounded transformation claims require `A.3.4`; method and work claims require `A.15` and `A.15.1`. For an actual Work claim, establish each performer’s A.13 core before independent A.15.1 occurrence admission. The profile is conditional as stated in §4.1.
`CC-A12-5`	A system-role-assignment field is filled only by one exact obtaining work-facing `U.SystemRoleAssignment`; any claim that exact Work was performed under it uses `F.6`. System-role-kind relation claims require `A.2.7`.
`CC-A12-6`	Evidence and source-use claims use A.10’s direct relations; a separately current assurance conclusion uses B.3.
`CC-A12-7`	Episteme and publication cases do not assign agency to the episteme or publication form.
`CC-A12-8`	Changing another holon does not make it a part of the acting system. A filled singular crossing reference resolves one exact obtaining relation and its defining rule. If that rule is absent, leave the field unfilled and state the A.6.RCD `missing-governor` problem: the participants, needed sentence and receiving use. An ordinary explanation is enough; no additional record is required. Any containing-whole claim requires a separately admitted exact part-whole relation.