A.15.1:6.7 - Classification work without result collapse

Pump37_RecognitionWork_2026-07-20T1015_1022 is one Work individual admitted under U.Work, with temporal extent 10:15–10:22. RecognitionEvaluatorAssignment is a directly declared species whose signature uses the local RecognitionEvaluatorSystemRole domain. The fixture declares RecognitionEvaluatorSystemRole as a local agential kind, gives its evaluation-action membership criterion, classifies RecognitionEvaluator_A under it, and cites evidence that the System satisfies that local criterion for the scope and window; no Grade or autonomy-profile claim is used. Pump37_EvaluatorAssignment_2026-07-20 is its obtaining occurrence, with RecognitionEvaluator_A as holder and an extent covering the Work. Exact F.6 performedUnderAssignment and enactsMethod(Pump37_RecognitionWork_2026-07-20T1015_1022, HolonRecognitionEvaluation@FPF) obtain. FPFRecognitionWorkBoundaryRelations declares RecognitionWorkOccursWithinServiceBoundary(work, system); under its stated service delimitation and 10:15–10:22 window, the relation obtains for this Work and FPF_Recognition_Service_A. A.6.1 application Pump37_RecognitionApplication_2026-07-20T1017 has obtaining candidateArgument -> Pump_37 and judgmentResult -> unknown bindings, so candidate participation and returned value need no generic affected-referent or Work-result relation. This fixture supplies no admitted evaluator-time or runner-compute resource-use predicate; return missing-governor[PUMP37-RESOURCE-USE] for those optional claims without lowering the Work or application bindings.

The returned unknown value remains the A.6.1 result binding. No U.Transformation of Pump_37 or of a classification record is asserted. This evaluation Work remains admitted from the stated performer’s A.13 basis, independently grounded performance history, enacted Method, extent, and the obtaining service-boundary relation just stated; its covering assignment and F.6 attribution remain separate obtaining facts. The application binding is another separate fact, and the absent optional resource-use predicates do not lower the Work. No pre-state, post-state, or delta is needed. Candidate-side criterion satisfaction remains under A.1; evidence and assurance remain neighboring relations; and any materialized classification assertion or evaluation-result episteme remains under C.2.1.