Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 04:10:10 UTC

A.15.3:7 - Conformance Checklist

IDRequirementPractical test
CC-A15.3-01The item is WorkPlan content, not a U-kind, record, or relation occurrence.Its designator resolves inside one cited WorkPlan episteme; no independent PlanItem identity or row authority is claimed.
CC-A15.3-02The WorkPlan keeps its already identified present EntityOfConcern; the item separately names the future performance being planned.Planning that performance does not make it an existing entity, reference target, or dated Work.
CC-A15.3-03Every row points to one declaration edition and member whose pattern defines both member meaning and actual-use predicate.The declaration reference, local member designator, family, defining pattern, and predicate route all resolve; A.15.3 states only the intention.
CC-A15.3-04Relation rows use only admitted A.6.5 SlotSpecs inside cited RelationSignature editions.A.2.1 HolderSystemSlot resolves; hypothetical PartHolonSlot and WholeHolonSlot do not and return the named blocker.
CC-A15.3-05Operation rows use A.6.1 argument or result declarations.Mechanism edition, operation designator, member designator, ValueKind, designation rule, binding predicate, and cardinality resolve together.
CC-A15.3-06Any other target has a pattern that explicitly defines it.Missing member meaning, actual-use predicate, or defining pattern yields missing-governor, not a generic target.
CC-A15.3-07The planned value follows the member’s ValueKind, designation rule, and cardinality.A single-valued target has at most one effective planned value; conditions and a resolution rule select among alternatives, while multivalued and ordering semantics come from the declaration.
CC-A15.3-08A row states a positive intention.Omission is open-world; prohibitions, exclusions, required absence, and completeness use separate plan claims rather than empty or negated fillers.
CC-A15.3-09Planned filling remains planned.No row establishes dated work, relation obtaining, application, binding, returned result, change, production, delivery, acceptance, or outcome.
CC-A15.3-10Plan revision follows C.2.1 WorkPlan identity.Changed identity-bearing content identifies another WorkPlan episteme; edition continuity is asserted only when EpistemeEditionRelation obtains, and PlanItems gain no separate edition ontology.
CC-A15.3-11Later actual facts are established independently.Identify Work under A.15.1; establish actual relation participation and application bindings under the relation’s direct predicate and the A.6.1 binding predicates respectively. None follows from a plan row.
CC-A15.3-12Later comparison preserves the cited baseline and polarity.Substitution or variance uses a stated comparison policy; a missing-filler or negative result needs its closure or negative criterion and case facts.
CC-A15.3-13Edition, reference, and policy pins are concrete and decision-relevant.No implicit latest, generic RefKind, generic PolicyRef, publication face, or conflicting pin controls a row.
CC-A15.3-14Conditions and views do not become plan authority.Time, location, readiness, evidence, gate, bridge, publication, and comparison claims are cited from their own patterns; cards and views add no rows or rules.