A.15.7:5 - Archetypal Grounding

A.15.7:5.1 - DJ performance

A DJ is already performing under an event performance Method. The current track is ending, the DJ directly hears that room response has fallen, one promised genre constraint still applies, and three known tracks fit the remaining time. The DJ rules out one track because its transition violates the domain Method, recognizes a familiar cue favoring a second, briefly checks how the transition is likely to land, and chooses it.

The answer names the chosen track and reason, the DJ as chooser and intended performer, and the condition for abandoning the transition. The current Work separately enacts the performance Method and, because this steering Method was actually used, the steering Method. The playlist shows available material; it is not the performer, the whole Method, or proof that either enactment obtains.

A.15.7:5.2 - Social dance or jazz

During one performance, a participant recognizes a familiar phrase ending and chooses a contribution that fits the domain Method and the other participants’ current response. A quick forecast is enough because the contribution is reversible and the next cue arrives immediately. If several materially different contributions need comparison, the chooser forms a current option set and opens C.11; otherwise no formal comparison record is needed.

The performers, deciding System, musical or movement material, interaction, Methods, and Work occurrence remain distinct. “Improvisation” is a retrieval word here, not a universal Method or permission for random variation.

A.15.7:5.3 - Case handling and stale information

A worker is performing one case-handling Work occurrence under a domain Method. A displayed case state predates newly filed evidence. Because that age can change the action, the worker refreshes the case state before relying on it. If refresh is unavailable, the worker uses the declared safe fallback or stops. The case file records claims; it neither chooses, supplies authority, nor performs Work.

The worker also uses an identified procedure whose version and applicability remain unchanged. The displayed copy has no separate expiry field, and this use requires none. The worker retains that procedure while refreshing the case-state claim affected by the new evidence. The result names the current next action and its limits, with no separate certificate for retaining the unaffected procedure.

If the organization’s admitted case-handling Method already includes this steering Method, state that composition separately. Do not infer it from the case model or a repeated workflow label.

A.15.7:5.4 - AI recommendation

An AI system using a model proposes the next inspection action, but a sensor condition changed after the model’s input window closed. The model and recommendation remain separate from the deciding and performing Systems. The responsible deciding System refreshes the input, tests the recommendation under the current Method and safety constraints, uses a safe fallback, or stops. A confident score establishes neither currentness, authority, capability, nor the action.