A.15.8:6.1 - Literature qualification across a researcher, services, and files

Situation. LiteratureQualificationWork-2026-08-27-AM is one admitted actual Work occurrence. Researcher-17 is first recovered as an actual performer through A.13, and A.15.1 admits the Work independently. This recovery account also compares accountability under one named assignment, so it separately establishes the exact A.2.1 occurrence and F.6 attribution; failure of that later relation would lower only the accountability attribution, not erase the Work. A search service, language-model service, repository, pinned papers, claim sheet, and unresolved-question note support the Work; none becomes a performer or constituent of a new whole merely by appearing in the configuration. A reviewer may continue later.

Probe. The fresh-session and reviewer-handoff probe removes the original model session and asks the reviewer to recover the bounded question, exact source editions, accepted and rejected claim reasons, open uncertainty, and next probe.

Observation and result. The reviewer can recover the papers but cannot distinguish why one claim was rejected because the claim sheet lacks a decision reason and one citation lacks an edition pin. The result focuses on the exact Work occurrence, identifies the missing source and record relations, and returns two repairs to their representation and source owners. The unsupported claim stops. No “extended researcher”, composite System, or researcher capability is inferred.

What changed. Repair the source pin and decision record before continuing; do not ask the person or model to “remember better”.