Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:00:10 UTC
A.15.9:3 - Forces
Force
Tension
Reuse versus fresh Work
A current qualified result can be cheaper and safer than a new request; a narrower answer can remain useful when a stronger one is unsupported. Acquisition must earn its cost without treating a stale or wrong-configuration answer as adequate.
Small request versus useful boundary
The receiver needs a short request without omitting the subject, situation, use, and stop that make the answer meaningful.
Supplier judgement versus receiver authority
The supplier governs its Method and professional conclusion; the receiver still owns the decision that consumes it unless a separate authority relation says otherwise.
Informal exchange versus recoverability
Two sentences may be enough for a reversible choice; consequential reliance may require exact sources, Work, evidence, authority, dissent, and currentness.
Named specialist versus supported performer
A title, department, credential, provider label, or tool name can help find a candidate but does not establish capability, assignment, authority, or performed Work.
Recognition versus assurance
A vague outside-practice dependency is enough to open the pattern; high-consequence use requires stronger direct evidence, assurance, and stop rules.
Shared move versus domain ownership
The inspect-reuse-or-request boundary transfers across practices, while every domain keeps its own questions, Methods, evidence standards, acceptance, and consequences.