A.15.9:5.3 - A fluent tool output is not specialist approval

A case worker receives a generated summary labelled verified legal review. The summary cites no governing edition, jurisdiction, case configuration, performing Agent, Method, or authority. It may help locate sources, but it cannot support the current eligibility decision.

The case worker returns: “The generated summary can help locate sources, but is not qualified for this eligibility decision in this jurisdiction. That decision remains blocked on the missing legal basis.” A dated legal-result request becomes a continuation only if the obtainable contribution warrants acquisition for this case. If later evidence supports the tool or another Agent as the actual performer of bounded legal-research Work, those facts still do not create legal authority or make the receiving administrative decision.