Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:00:08 UTC

A.15.9:6 - Precision restoration

Source phraseRecover before relying on itDo not infer
professional result or specialist returnThe actual governed result kind, subject, conditions, supplier practice, and receiving use.A new FPF result kind or universal profession ontology.
ask legal / safety / architecture / financeThe smallest result question and the decision it can change.A department, title, or field name already identifies the answer.
reviewThe reusable Method, planned Work, dated review Work, communication, and returned result that are actually claimed.Scheduling or delivery proves Work, acceptance, or adequacy.
approved or signed offThe exact result plus any separately supported authority, permission, acceptance, or gate relation.A word, signature image, or provider status transfers decision authority.
specialistThe candidate or actual performing Agent; for an actual-Agent claim, its A.13 core includes the obtaining assignment. Add current capability, access, conflict, and authority only when needed.Title, credential, organization, species, or tool label establishes those relations.
AI review or tool checkThe source or result, actual performer if current, Method, dated Work, provenance, checks, evidence, and authority boundary needed by this use.Fluency, automation, branding, or activity establishes truth, Work, permission, or acceptance.
received or deliveredThe communication or transfer that occurred, the independently identified result, and any separate acceptance and use.Delivery is production, acceptance, reliance, or effect.

Bias check. Institutional prestige, official status, publication recency, ubiquity, and academic praise are retrieval cues, not proof that a result is the best current answer or fits this use. Prefer the result that repairs known shortcomings and survives the receiving question’s evidence and applicability checks. An official standard may be the best available basis, but not because it is official.