A.15.PROD:4.4 - Ground actual effects without inventing transformation composition

The practitioner MUST first recover every actual transformation independently through A.3.4: changed referent, exact extent or formal boundary, boundary conditions, actual before/during/after facts, and continuity or reidentification rule. The practitioner MUST then name the declared domain predicate for each exact Work-to-transformation pair, state its participant order, and show the case facts that make it obtain. If no one direct predicate suffices, use a local compound claim selected under A.6.RCD disposition 2 only when its constructor, governed base predicates, actual participants, and case facts are recoverable. If neither route is present, keep the Work and transformation separate and return missing-governor[work-to-change]. Temporal overlap, a common changed referent, a delta expression, a log record, or a post-state picture may supply evidence for those facts; the declared predicate or compound claim and its obtaining facts establish the link.

One transformation identified at the resolution needed by the production claim establishes neither presence nor absence of finer transformation parts. Work parts, method parts, samples, temporal subdivisions, concurrent changes, and flow representations do not establish transformation parts or a composite transformation.

If the selected production claim uses only independently identified transformations, continue without a composition claim. If it asserts positive composite-transformation identity, transformation parthood, or transformation holonhood and no accepted governor supplies that basis, return the exact missing-governor blocker. Composite identityClosingWork under A.15.1 does not cure that blocker and does not imply an isomorphic composite transformation.