A.15.PROD:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them

Anti-pattern	Failure	Repair
Every work-caused transformation is production	Modification of a continuing entity is treated as entity creation or completed production.	The repair first recovers work plus actual change and opens only the production question needed by the receiver.
The final visible step created the product	Narrative order substitutes for first satisfaction of the exact applicable identity-specification episteme.	The repair recovers exact `identityClosingWork`, actual effects, the specification episteme, its named applicability predicate or filled local claim, and the earliest satisfying boundary.
Plan or log as production work	Intended or recorded material is treated as the dated occurrence.	The repair recovers exact A.15.1 work and relates plan, log, and evidence separately.
Shared label as work parthood	Two occurrences called assembly are treated as parent and part.	The repair states the exact A.15.1 work-part relation or keeps the occurrences separate.
Work parts imply transformation parts	Composite work is used as proof of a composite transformation.	The repair keeps transformations independently identified and returns the missing transformation-composition governor when needed.
Completion equals acceptance	A later customer or regulator verdict is used as the production-completion criterion.	State completion at its exact historical boundary and govern acceptance separately.
Current damage erases completion	Present nonconformance is used to deny an earlier satisfied criterion.	Keep the earlier claim indexed by its criterion, applicability basis, boundary, and boundary state; state the later transformation separately.
One omnibus production episteme	Work, inception, completion, delivery, and evidence are put into one claim with a union concern.	The repair splits one local C.2.1 episteme per selected question and direct neighboring claim.
Relation-name escalation	Familiar production wording is promoted to a universal relation kind.	The repair stops at A.6.RCD disposition 2 unless repeated subject semantics and occurrence identity independently justify continuation.