fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 31490–31499

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:01:07 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:04:31 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:10:10 UTC

A.16.1:21 - Practitioner Check Matrix and Migration Tests

A practitioner can test a cue pack with four questions:

  1. What exactly is being preserved? If the nucleus is unclear, the pack is under-specified.
  2. Why this pack rather than a later receiving form with more closure, a published route selection, or a passed endpoint test for the needed use? If the answer is only habit, the pack may be redundant.
  3. Which witness or anchor is primary? If none can be named where triage matters, the pack may be storage rather than preservation.
  4. Which downstream directions remain live, if any? If the publication hides them, later B.4.1 route publication will be distorted.

Migration from loose signal language should therefore reconstruct not just a vague “signal”, but the preserved cue nucleus, its primary witness or anchor, and any directional hints that are already honestly visible.