Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 03:40:20 UTC

A.16:4.1 - Canonical move table

This is the one canonical move table. Later examples apply it; they do not define another move family.

MoveUse it whenPublication resultKeep explicit
noticea low- or unstable-articulation cue is worth preservingpreservation-worthiness becomes explicit; a first typed preservation may beginwhy the cue is worth preserving and which witnesses remain
stabilizethe noticed cue needs a steadier local shape before route or endpoint choicePreArticulationCuePack or an equivalent early form may become admissiblecue nucleus, anchors, contrasts, witnesses, and preservation rationale
routea stabilized cue has several plausible downstream directions or one route must be selectedRoutedCueSet or another route-bearing publication makes plurality and any selection explicitlive routes, selected route if any, selection reason, and reopen condition
projectionone aspect of an explicit route must be foregrounded without claiming endpoint admissiona typed route-bounded partial publication on an existing MVPK facewhat is foregrounded, what is omitted or lost, and how reopen remains possible
formalizearticulation or closure can increase under a named later rulea more explicit symbolic, slot, or normal-form publicationthe rule used, changed facets, and any new evidence-generating Work boundary
operationalizeselected content is ready to face a method, Work, gate, or other operational questionthe episteme or project record is docked to the pattern that defines or tests that usethe exact downstream contribution, its guard, and any world-facing Work boundary
reopenthe current route, frame, or closure no longer holds cleanlya publication in the same broad family expresses the reduced closure claimreopened rivals, retained witnesses, and which prior endpoint-use or current-use claim no longer holds
sketchBackoffan endpoint-bound or operational form over-commits the available groundsan exploratory cue-bearing form becomes admissible againretained anchors and witnesses, withdrawn closure, and the next safe question
respecifythe broad family remains plausible but its framing scaffold, facet reading, or route specification is wronga revised framing or route specification replaces the earlier onereplaced commitments, invariants that stay fixed, and any episteme-identity change
retirea cue, route-bearing publication, episteme, or branch is no longer current for the named use because its grounds failed, a successor took over, or a current-use decision endedretirement or withdrawal is explicitreason, exact retired object, successor or no-successor note, and preserved history

The table names moves, not the resulting objects. PreArticulationCuePack, RoutedCueSet, and U.AbductivePrompt are publication forms defined elsewhere. A claim-bearing episteme remains U.Episteme; E.24.PUB separately defines a bounded publication occurrence.

projection means route-bounded partialization. Its result must be a typed publication form; an MVPK face alone or an untyped placeholder is not enough. respecify changes framing, route specification, or a facet-profile reading. Precision repair remains with A.6.P or C.16.Q; recovery of an ambiguous action-oriented claim or question remains with A.6.A.

Do not use A.16 to decide measurement admissibility, Bridge substitution, endpoint ontology, or another subject claim. Name the applicable pattern and test directly; A.16 coordinates only the publication move that makes that question current.