fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 30775–30793

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:35:10 UTC

A.16:7 - Conformance checklist

Use this one checklist for authoring and review:

  1. A.16 does not redefine F, an endpoint test, Work, publication, or a graph-path calculus.
  2. The note uses one move from §4.1 and names the facet or route guard; rhetorical relabeling is insufficient.
  3. The identity case is explicit. A precursor needs no invented source episteme; a form-only case preserves all C.2.1 discriminators; changed content identifies a target episteme and records preserved, changed, and lost content.
  4. The source condition, typed target form, and object or claim that the downstream pattern defines, constrains, or tests are recoverable. The publication occurrence and MVPK face are added only when material and substitute for none of them.
  5. projection names a typed route-bounded form and its omissions; respecify does not hide an A.6.P, C.16.Q, or A.6.A precision repair.
  6. Route plurality or selection, endpoint disposition, publication availability, and current-use or retirement claims remain separate.
  7. A multi-route publication is not called a lineage fork. A true fork names separate successor identities, losses, and exact lineage relations.
  8. Reopen, backoff, respecify, and retire say which witnesses remain and which closure, route selection, endpoint use, publication, or current-use claim changes.
  9. Any dated Work and Work-result claim is established separately under its own patterns.
  10. Docking or a Work crossing alone establishes no authority, responsibility, permission, or commitment change. A real change names the exact relation and its own participants, object or action, scope, interval, and instituting or ending act. An unchanged-relation claim requires an applicable negative criterion or complete closure basis.
  11. Use EndpointAdmissionProfile only to judge admissible docking; apply all of the endpoint pattern’s own conditions.
  12. A short note stands alone. A.16.0 opens only at the §4.7 threshold, and E.18 opens only for an independently selected TransformationFlowStructure.
  13. A summarized chain leaves intermediate move identities, endpoint-rule changes, losses, and material status changes reconstructible.
  14. Compared histories are typed by form, move, applicable pattern or rule, and independent status claims; they are not compared as generic “maturity speed.”