A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.6 - Thin interpretation remains a complete admissible form

Many cases need one interpretive view but not one atlas-form interpretation package.

Stay with one thinner interpretive view when:

• the current reading needs only one declared source set or one derived view over it;
• the current question does not need several typed set views assembled at once;
• one explicit interpretive sentence is enough to keep the current line readable;
• or the case does not genuinely depend on metrics, transitions, or bridge-loss notes.

This matters because the interpretive layer should stay proportionate to the inspection question. If a thin interpretive view already solves the reader’s problem, forcing atlas form would over-type the line and create fake necessity.