A.19.ECS:5 - Archetypal Grounding

Show, FPF pattern quality. The evaluated object kind is one FPF pattern version. The existing evaluation is E.21, so A.19.ECS stays closed unless E.21 itself is being redesigned. E.23 may improve the pattern version under E.21.

Show, DRR adequacy. The evaluated object kind is one DRR version for a declared campaign-decision use. The existing evaluation is E.9.DA. If a campaign needs a different DRR adequacy coordinate, A.19.ECS can test whether that coordinate belongs inside E.9.DA, another evaluation, or no current FPF pattern.

Show, FPF Pillar adequacy. The evaluated object is FPF as a corpus or release candidate. E.2 gives the Pillars; E.2.DA is the evaluation. A.19.ECS explains why E.2.DA needs evaluated object, use, eligibility, coordinates, evidence loci, stop meanings, and neighbour governing relations rather than a Pillar essay.

Show, name improvement. The evaluated object is a durable term candidate. F.18 already supplies a grouped lexical quality vector: SemanticFidelity, CognitiveErgonomics, MorphologicalActionFit, and AliasRisk, plus NQD discipline over candidate names. A.19.ECS treats F.18 as an existing local evaluation for naming, not as a reason to build another one.

Show, no evaluation yet. A team says “make this onboarding method better” but cannot say better for whom, by what values, or with what stop. A.19.ECS opens before E.23: it names evaluated object kind, user, use, contrast cases, candidate characteristics, scales, floors, missingness, protected trade-offs, and neighbour governing relations. Only then can E.22 frame an improvement-oriented quality evaluation and E.23 improve the method.