Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 03:45:20 UTC

A.19.SPR:1 - Problem frame

FPF needs compact state words. Engineers reasonably say that a pump is stable, a source is current, an evidence path is incomplete, an assurance claim has expired, or an intended performance is ready for work entry.

The words work when the reader can recover the item, the actual claim or value, and the rule behind it. Trouble begins when the word replaces those facts. “Ready” may mean a patient condition, an assignment satisfying a condition, an A.15.5 work-entry result, an A.21 gate decision, or merely a green display. Those are different claims.

A repaired sentence may therefore name an ordinary domain condition, an obtaining relation, an assertion episteme, an evaluation result, a decision result, or a project-side record field. It introduces a predicate only when the rule for that claim defines or needs one.