A.19:5.2.3 - Predicate-use and state-assertion boundary
A.19 defines the space and CharacteristicSpacePredicate; it does not define a state assertion, applicability relation, dated evaluation work, gate, evidence relation, assurance result, or permission to act.
A consumer use recovers: the exact subject or input; any direct characteristic assignment or projection from that subject; the A.19 space and predicate; one set-valued U.ClaimScope; relevant A.2.6 U.ContextSlice membership; effective U.ReferenceScheme and reference plane; application or evaluation window; and, only when current, any obtaining F.9 Bridge with its separate bounded-use claim and reliance, plus any applicable plane relation. The consumer identifies the exact evaluation-operation application and its typed result under the applicable evaluation or assertion rule. A.10 provenance, G.11 currentness, measurement backing, assurance, and receiving-work disposition remain separate.
For a Ready claim requiring temperature below a cut and pressure above a cut, A.19 supplies the two declared coordinates, scales, normalization or coordinate-mapping basis, operators, cuts, polarity, and conjunction. The actual state assertion binds the pump, scope, slice, evaluation interval, inputs, result, and evidence use. Any semantic Bridge or plane relation needed by that use remains separate. Changing the evaluation interval does not change the predicate; changing either cut does.
Transporting a predicate into another space or transporting an assertion across spaces requires the exact Coordinate correspondence. Use an embedding only for point-injective structure-preserving transport; use a declared lossy mapping or projection when normalization discards distinctions. If the use relates two exact F.17 local senses and the F.9 predicate obtains, cite that Bridge and its separate bounded-use claim. If the ReferencePlane changes, cite the applicable plane relation. A scheme or plane difference alone establishes neither relation. If the required correspondence is absent, the current use is incomparable or unevaluable rather than approximately valid.