CC-A1-1 | The exact candidate is first individuated as U.Entity; the public holon kind is already admitted in FPF before the candidate is tested against A.1. E.24.UK governs admission of public U-kinds; A.1 does not repeat that decision or require its result as a candidate-test input. |
CC-A1-2 | A current recognition use separately recovers the exact candidate, exact constituents, constructive part-relation occurrences and assembly, reidentification rule, composition-grounded whole-level characteristic, and candidate-side compatibility with an applicable governed larger-assembly construction method or rule; it then names the already admitted holon kind and its direct kind-specific condition. |
CC-A1-3 | A proposed new public holon kind first passes E.24.UK; its direct pattern then states the kind-specific membership condition without changing the common A.1 criterion for exact candidates. |
CC-A1-4 | Candidate classification is not reified as a status relation. World-side satisfaction or failure, classification work, `true |
CC-A1-5 | System-role-kind classification, U.SystemRoleAssignment, capability, method, work, transformation, functioning, evidence, and temporal claims remain separate; their reference bundle is not asserted as another occurrence. |
CC-A1-6 | U.Episteme is non-agentive. Systems may publish, cite, use, or perform revision Work concerning epistemes, but changed claim content identifies another episteme and any edition relation is separately governed. |
CC-A1-7 | Collection belonging under the collection’s own rule, a possible holon, an acting collective System, a whole-level characteristic, and B.2 whole reidentification are kept distinct. |
CC-A1-8 | Boundary wording recovers an exact delimitation relation, criterion, or selected structure from its direct pattern; crossing wording preserves the exact crossing relation occurrence without minting universal delimitation or crossing relation kinds. F.9 applies when the claim needs a semantic correspondence or difference between two exact F.17 local senses from different semantic contexts. |
CC-A1-9 | Changing, controlling, teaching, measuring, or repairing another holon does not make that holon a part of the acting system; any actual containing-whole claim names a separately grounded part-whole relation. |
CC-A1-10 | A.14 and the direct part-relation patterns identify exact obtaining parthood; C.13 may ground an assembly only from those facts and does not create them; use B.3.5 only for a named assurance use. |
CC-A1-11 | Publication forms, construction traces, and descriptions of holons remain distinct from the holons and world-side construction facts they describe. |
CC-A1-12 | A candidate U.System, U.Episteme, U.Method, U.Work, or U.Discipline may use constructive grounding only after its direct patterns identify exact parts and whole-forming relations; a selected dependent U.Structure is not a holon by selection or name. |
CC-A1-13 | Several actual changes are not classified as one composite transformation or holon without a direct transformation-composition governor; a missing governor neither proves composition nor proves atomism. |