Link to current text
A.2.1:3 - Forces
| Force | Tension |
|---|
| Common attribution projection vs domain-specific assignment identity | F.6 needs the holder of every assignment, while domains can require different real participants. |
| Simple cases vs stronger appointments | A two-participant assignment should stay light; a real commission or position must not be hidden or downgraded. |
| Readable assertion vs explicit occurrence | Most readers need a sentence, while later attribution or state claims may need a stable assignment reference. |
| Stable participants vs repeated episodes | Identical participant values can recur after an interruption; time describes and distinguishes episodes without becoming a participant. |
| Interpretation vs world-side identity | Taxonomies, schemes, signatures, and evidence matter to claims but do not automatically participate in the assignment. |
| Assignment vs neighboring facts | Classification, capability, permission, responsibility, access, Method, and Work can vary independently. |