A.1 | Supplies holon and system grounding. |
A.2 | Use for exact local system-role kinds and C.3.2 classification judgments; neither carries capability by label. |
A.2.1 | Use for directly declared species under U.SystemRoleAssignment; an assignment’s holder System may separately have capability. |
A.2.5 | Use for SystemRoleAssignmentStateRelation and Work-admitting state conditions; assignment state is not capability. |
A.2.7 | Use for SystemRoleKindRelationStructure; admission substitution or incompatibility among system-role kinds does not create capability. |
A.3.1 | Governs U.Method; method may require capability thresholds. |
A.3.2 | Governs membership of one already identified claim-bearing episteme in U.MethodDescription; algorithm, procedure, or possession wording is only a cue until the exact admitted Method EntityOfConcern and substantive way-of-doing claim are recovered. An admitted method description may separately state required capability. |
A.3.3 | Governs U.Dynamics, the state-space and transition-law episteme; dynamics may explain or predict capability but is not the qualified holder ability. |
A.15, A.15.1, A.15.2 | Govern method, plan, and performed work alignment; capability is one input to work admission, not work itself. |
A.6.5 | Supplies SlotSpec discipline for capability relation fields and capability-use relations. |
A.6.F | Repairs function and functionality wording that may hide capability, method, work, math function, or functional-architecture claims. |
A.6.RSIR | Use it to recover relation, signature, interface, system-role, participation, declaration-position, and slot wording before capability repair when the source sentence is mixed; use E.10.ROLE to select the branch for bare role. |
C.27.TA, C.27 | Use C.27.TA when a positive temporal aspect of capability—currentness, window, rhythm, or drift—is itself relied on; use C.27 for temporal-claim adequacy. |
C.2.1, A.10, B.3, C.28, F.10, E.17 | Govern episteme, evidence, assurance, counterfactual, status, and publication-use relations that may justify or qualify a statement or reliance use about a capability claim. |
C.16.P, A.19 | Govern characteristic, scale, and characteristic-space recovery when capability measures depend on declared measured aspects. |
C.25 | Governs composite quality families and Q-Bundles that may supply slots for capability-fit checks. |
C.30, C.32.HCS, C.32.ACS, C.32.ACE | Govern architecture-characteristic material, project criteria rows, and eval readings that may constrain capability use without thereby establishing the holder’s ability. |
| Promise-content and commitment patterns | Govern outward promise and commitment relations; a promise or commitment claim may cite a capability relation, but capability does not become promise or commitment. |