Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 04:45:20 UTC

A.2.4:5 - Archetypal Grounding

A.2.4:5.1 - Proof result used as evidence

ProofResult-12 is a C.2.1 episteme stating an entailment under GraphTheory_v3.1. Dated checker work, its method, theory and proof bindings, and the formal entailment result are recovered under their subject patterns. A.2.4 classifies the episteme as supporting Theorem-12 inside the theory-version fence. A.10 records source/provenance; in later review work, a reviewer uses the episteme through an exact premise relation. Timeout or checker failure would remain distinct from refutation.

A.2.4:5.2 - Measurement result used in acceptance

PressureResult-E is the C.16 measurement-result episteme for gas pressure at port P. It states the measurand, Characteristic, Scale, value, uncertainty, model, calibration basis, time stance, and dated measurement work. A.2.4 classifies it as evidence used for the exact pressure-limit claim. In separate evaluation work, an evaluator applies the G.4 clause through A.6.1 bindings and obtains unknown; a different C.2.1 episteme states that verdict. A.10/G.6 preserve provenance, G.11 currentness, and in later C.11 decision work, a decision-maker relies on the verdict episteme. Raw detector output, indication, pressure state, measurement result, verdict, and decision remain distinct.

A.2.4:5.3 - Dashboard status cell

A release dashboard displays Ready. A.2.4 may classify the cell as a status-use carrier for one named status assertion. The source register, scope, window, status value, G.11 currentness, and provenance must be recoverable. A.21 remains the pattern for any gate decision, C.11 any release decision, A.2.8.PER any permission, A.15.1 any performed work, and B.3 any assurance claim. A copied or stale cell establishes none of them.

A.2.4:5.4 - Simulation-only output

A simulation-output episteme is classified for one bounded C.28 claim. C.28 retains simulationResultRef, model assumptions, validation, the causal-use support result, supported use, and unsupported use. A.2.4 cannot relabel the episteme as realized-counterfactual or interventional evidence; simulation Work, simulator result, result episteme, provenance, and later reliance remain separate.